US President Donald Trump has threatened Iran with being bitten worse than ever before in response to Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s comment on Wednesday that he will order uranium enrichment to high amounts in the coming days.

In early May, Rouhani had given the world until July 7 to relieve the Islamic republic’s economy from US sanctions in the nuclear standoff or face Tehran reducing its compliance with nuclear restrictions.

Until now, such threats from Trump seemed to put even the most powerful countries on edge and convince them to at least entertain a new path that he was pressing for.

But has Iran now exposed Trump as more bark than bite?

Certainly, Trump’s maximum pressure campaign has, to date, been even more successful than expected in bringing Tehran’s economy to a grinding halt.

But the purpose of the pressure campaign was always to get Rouhani back to the negotiating table for a better nuclear deal than the 2015 one.

America blinked once in mid-June about responding to Iranian force with force, after the Islamic republic shot down an expensive US drone.

In response, Trump ordered a very limited military strike on three Iranian targets – which he then called off, settling on mere additional sanctions.

In baseball, that is called a whiff - a swinging strike.

But that is not the largest aspect of the US “blink.”

The larger one went almost completely unreported until just a few days ago, when Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) and a few media organizations started to report that China had received a million barrels of Iranian oil about two weeks ago.

Numerous reports from TankerTrackers have also surfaced about Chinese and Iranian tactics for quietly continuing oil shipments.

All of this is following a June 28 statement to Reuters and other media by Fu Cong, director general of the Chinese Foreign Ministry's Department of Arms Control, that: “We reject the unilateral imposition of sanctions and for us, energy security is important.”

So China is not saying out loud when it is importing oil from Iran; it appears to be trying to do so in a way that avoids directly embarrassing the US, but it is also being clear that it views the sanctions as improper.

What is fascinating about this development is that China did drop its imports of oil from Iran to zero in May and for half of June.

This initial drop in oil imports from China seemed to surprise Iranian officials.

But it seems – based on China-US trade negotiations and Iran's June 17 announcement that it would breach the nuclear deal's 300-kilogram limit by June 27 – that China reversed course and started to again accept Iranian oil.

Or it could be that China was very creative and never really stopped.

There were reports of a spike in shipping oil from Iran to China in April, leading up to the early May imposition of Washington's zero-oil sanctions.

It's possible that China imported extra oil from Iran in April to cover the following six-week period. Or maybe by combining the April spike with a possible current spike, Beijing may have made Tehran whole from any missed imports.

Such a tightrope strategy would have given the Trump administration a chance to look tough, while China could return to its long-term importing relationship with the Islamic republic once the issue had quieted down a bit.

And even during the six weeks when it was not importing Iranian oil, China always made it clear that it viewed US sanctions as invalid.

On Wednesday, Politico reported that the US State Department is officially considering giving China a special kind of waver based on the idea that it is not “importing oil for purchase,” but merely using oil imports from Iran to allow Tehran to pay off debts that it owes Beijing for various investments.

Call the oil purchases whatever you want. But even before the Politico report, the fact is that China was importing Iranian oil, the US administration has known about it, and for nearly two weeks it has done nothing.

If China can find a loophole to US oil sanctions on Iran, then why not India – and maybe South Korea, Turkey and even the EU?

And what new pressure can the US put on China, when it is already in a broader trade war that it is looking to end?

read more

Views: 16

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Good article.

It is not uncommon for China to take foothold in other nations by getting a nation hooked on China investments then to pay down debt China robs them of their nations resources and dumps China products. It has always it seems that in the international that China will always take in the public a stand of stay out of other nations business while quietly making a nation depend on them. China does not go to traditional war like conflict. They seem to rob the life blood from the peoples and the more corrupt their gov't is the better and the more poor off the nation is well that makes it a great target.

I thought Trump to be handling Iran issue smartly. The shot down drone is the second U.S. drone shot down by Iran, the first was during the O administration and that sucker came down in pretty darn good shape.

Iran is in a state of economic pain. That makes them most dangerous. They remind me of a street gang that goes around marking territory and hollering for respect. That makes them dangerous for nothing the West could do to fill their empty hole.

I suspect that the U.S. will eventually have to make strategic military strikes against Iran but if we keep them in a state of economic pain then an all out war will be avoided. 

We must secure our borders and ports.

I am not sure what other pressure we can put on China for China has not really helped with NK. What help has come from China's fear of NK peoples getting across their northern border. China sees S. Korea as a competitor as well Japan, North Vietnam and Trump is keeping warm and fuzzy relationships with them.

Checking China is more challenging than Iran.

What I believe is the world has some pretty bad actors and it's a volatile environment that could turn into a wwiii. 

Getting mfg back to the U.S. is critical.


Latest Activity

John Velisek posted a discussion

It’s Always Racism

Admitting to losing an argument is difficult for some people. Many times it is because they want to…See More
John Velisek posted an Editorial

It’s Always Racism

Admitting to losing an argument is difficult for some people. Many times it is because they want to…See More
Suzie Nielsen's discussion was featured

New World Order? or How to inform a Dem

N-new W-world O-order! Is it real? or a Conspiracy Theory?Or How to inform a democrat!by Susan N.…See More
Patricia Gillenwater replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion New World Order? or How to inform a Dem
"Much push back in Maricopa County, AZ about extending light rail, another extension not needed,…"
luis✩USA replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
""(not intended to be an endorsement of the other major party.. I hate (fill in the blank) IS…"
Larry Puckette replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
" was the plan all along -- Justice Democrats it's a coup, whether it be legal or not.…"
Michael Trivisani replied to LANYON's discussion Epstein Accuser BREAKS SILENCE, Gives Stomach Turning Confession
"It's past due...  He should have gotten it by now."
Patricia Gillenwater replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion New World Order? or How to inform a Dem
"Suzie, Great and true words. "

Volcano's and Earthquakes

Your Contribution is Greatly Appreciated

Donate safely and securely through PayPal

© 2019   Created by Suzie Nielsen.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service