The terrifying and terrible prospect of Justice Kennedy retiring

The end of the Supreme Court term looms, and with it the prospect — the terrifying prospect — of a retirement. Specifically, the retirement of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who will turn 81 next month and is the longest-serving current justice, named to the high court almost 30 years ago.

So if Kennedy is inclined to retire, it is hard to begrudge him that choice. But his departure would be terrible for the court and terrible for the country. It could not come at a worse time. Any court vacancy these days, under a president of either party, triggers a battle between liberal and conservative forces. Kennedy’s retirement would unleash nomination Armageddon, given the feral political environment and the pivotal role he plays on the closely divided court.

To understand the impact of Kennedy’s departure, just look back to his selection to fill the seat vacated by Justice Lewis Powell. Like Kennedy now, Powell was the ultimate swing justice; his was the key fifth vote for liberals on issues including abortion rights and affirmative action, topics as charged then as they are today.

Imagine, then, a Kennedy retirement in this partisan and unstable political landscape. It could make the Bork fight look like a kindergarten squabble. With President Trump under investigation by the special counsel and his approval rating mired below 40 percent, his incentive may be to cater to his base with a pick as far to the right as possible, an instinct enabled by the Republicans’ move, during the confirmation of Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, to eliminate the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.

Justice Kennedy, perhaps it is unfair to pile all this onto your shoulders, but is it really wise to subject an already divided country to even more turbulence?

And to another nomination by this president, with his evident ignorance of the role of the judiciary and disdain for judicial independence?

Your career has been characterized by insistence on civility, respect for the dignity of all individuals and commitment to the rule of law — qualities absent in our president. Just read Trump’s tweets and ask yourself: Do I really want my successor named by this man?

No need to look back to the campaign, and his repugnant comments about the “Mexican” judge presiding over the Trump University fraud lawsuit. Just consider the president’s tweets about judicial rulings in the case that has now reached your own court. He blasted the “so-called judge”; assailed “slow and political” courts; and, most alarming, suggested that blood would be on the judiciary’s hands if a terrorist incident took place while his travel ban was being delayed.

The hearing didn’t get much attention, but consider, too, the Trump appellate court nominees who came before the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month. One, Kentucky lawyer John Bush, nominated to the 6th Circuit, posted pseudonymous writings on a political blog that touched on President Barack Obama’s Kenyan heritage, referred to then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) as “Mama Pelosi” and suggested that someone should “gag the House speaker.” In another post, Bush described slavery and abortion as “the two greatest tragedies in our country” and said they “relied on similar reasoning and activist justices at the U.S. Supreme Court, first in the Dred Scott decision, and later in Roe.” Query whether you, Justice Kennedy, would count as one of those activist judges, having joined the controlling opinion that kept Roe v. Wade from being overturned in 1992?

Another nominee, Damien Schiff, nominated to the Court of Federal Claims, used a different blog to denounce anti-bullying efforts for “teaching ‘gayness’ in public schools,” and to criticize the court’s ruling in Lawrence v. Texas — that’s your ruling, Justice Kennedy — striking down state laws criminalizing homosexual sodomy.

Oh, and also, to observe that “it would seem that Justice Kennedy is (and please excuse the language) a judicial prostitute, ‘selling’ his vote as it were to four other justices in exchange for the high that comes from aggrandizement of power and influence, and the blandishments of the fawning media and legal academy.”

Justice Kennedy, does the president who chose this man really deserve to name your replacement?

Read more from Ruth Marcus’s archive

Views: 144

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sharin'

Justice Ginsburg is next . . . as soon as the other Supreme's quit propping her up behind the bench.

They've been wishing and praying for Ginsberg for a decade now.  Haven't you heard?  Us old broads outlast you men any day and twice on Sunday.  *lol*

First I do not think our President "is ignorant" of the role of courts. That is a complete bias that leans left. Of course the left and their representatives in the Senate would 'go postal".

I look towards the possibility with optimistic hope that we could make a dent in the liberal leaning court as well the lower courts where the President has the opportunity to make nominations for some 100 judges. Also if the Senate acts to on a bill to break up the 9th circuit. I would call that a win not only for America but would inform me that my vote was not wasted.

The dems will act the way they have no matter what, its the minority party.

I would love seeing Mike Lee as Kennedy's replacement.

Kennedy retiring is not a bad thing! It's very good. Look what he wrote as the leading opinion to property rights last week. Flip-Flop Kennedy and Lefty Ginsburg both need to retire and allow Trump to replace them with good conservatives. Trump has proven he's smart when it comes to judicial appointments not only for SCOTUS but for all fed courts. An upcoming convention of states will propose term limits on all fed courts including SCOTUS and we can begin turning the Court away from politics and back to the original Constitution. The main problem today is SCOTUS.    

agreed (minus the COS stuff).. caveating with "IF" Gorsuch proves to be 'all that'.

if I grasp the whole argument of the original post it is that it would be horrible and terrible because the inevitable fistfight with progressives would be about Kennedy's replacement. to that I rebut -- Bring it on, it's long overdue. Being afraid of that fight is killing us.   besides that, it's such an cowardly R thing to do -- rejecting success due to being afraid of a fight. Who want's to emulate that??

I agree

I agree as well. Really folks if its not a fight about healthcare or an appointment to the courts they will jump on some other issue. R's fight back with a display of the 'back bone'.

RSS

Latest Activity

Patricia Gillenwater replied to luis✩USA's discussion POLITICS...ARGH!
"Love your words Luis. "
2 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to luis✩USA's discussion POLITICS...ARGH!
"Doesn't matter, Larry. The democrat-socialist media, on cue, are accusing DT of being…"
7 hours ago
Larry Puckette replied to luis✩USA's discussion POLITICS...ARGH!
"p.s. = ...and then i cringe at going back to news and finding that he's 'went there'…"
8 hours ago
Larry Puckette replied to luis✩USA's discussion POLITICS...ARGH!
"@ fauxcahontas = just read about it backfiring on her big time today, in a few ways - in a few…"
9 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to luis✩USA's discussion POLITICS...ARGH!
"FLORIDA It's been reported that THREE state supreme court justices will be retired when the…"
9 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
""ACA and PATRIOT ACT +/or it's decendents are the current era equivalents to that and the…"
9 hours ago
Larry Puckette replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
"Those poisonous weeds should have pulled from its roots very early on when they were still close to…"
10 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to luis✩USA's discussion POLITICS...ARGH!
"So . . .yh . . .FAUXcahontas strikes OUT again! (chuckle) A last count her dna score was is in the…"
10 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion The Steam Room
""84 views", huh. It means squat, Suzie. Example:  Everytime a person visits this…"
13 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
""our grandparents/parents' generations failed by letting the seeds be planted and…"
14 hours ago
Patricia Gillenwater replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion The Steam Room
"I would say if JustSocial takes off it most likely would morph into  a social justice site.…"
21 hours ago
Larry Puckette replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
"yeah, it's possible.. generally, our grandparents/parents' generations failed by letting…"
yesterday
LANYON posted a discussion

Democrats' New Strategy: Destroy The Institutions Of American Gov

Democrats' New Strategy: Destroy The Institutions Of American GovernmentBack in 2013, President…See More
Sunday
luis✩USA replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
""Trump not foiled their plans. I see no reason to think they've just faded…"
Sunday
Suzie Nielsen shared LANYON's discussion on Facebook
Saturday
Larry Puckette replied to Larry Puckette's discussion My random topics thread ...
"2015 2017 now"
Friday

Volcano's and Earthquakes


© 2018   Created by Suzie Nielsen.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service