TRUE OR FALSE?.... this “Disarmament Commission – Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group” document... IS IT REAL???

Is This Document The Smoking Gun Of The United Nations’   Disarmament Plan For America?

      

The internet has been on fire about this “Disarmament Commission – Civilian  Weapons Confiscation Study Group” document that has been floating around social  media sites. There have been many reporters “claiming” this document is a  fraud.  I would like to dig a little deeper to see if they are possibly  spreading  disinformation in order to calm down the American people, or are they  telling  the truth?

According to Politifact:

The document is persuasive enough to have been picked up by pro-gun advocates  on a few message boards and Facebook pages. But is it real?

When we checked with the United Nations, a spokesman declared it a fake.

“I checked the document number on our internal document system, and the reply  I got back now was simply, ‘There is no document matching your request,’ said  Farhan Haq, associate spokesperson for the Secretary-General. “The document  number (A/CN.11/L.72) doesn’t conform to our standard system, in any case.”

In addition, Haq said, “there is no such body as a ‘Civilian Weapons  Confiscation Study Group.’ Nor does the United Nations involve itself in  confiscating weapons from member states.”

Finally, Haq said, “the use of blue ink, some of the type font and the  scanner icon in the bottom right-hand corner are not found in real U.N.  documents. So, in several different ways, this document is fake.”

Our ruling

A document found on the Internet and circulating via email and social media  says that a United Nations working group has “adopted a proposed agenda” to  enable member nations to “disarm civilians within their borders.” If the  document were real, it would confirm the worst fears of those who fear a mass  confiscation of handguns, hunting rifles and ammunition in the U.S. — but a  United Nations spokesman cited several reasons for concluding that the document  is a fake, including the fact that the study group referenced in the document  does not exist. We rate the document Pants on Fire.

Is This Document The Smoking Gun Of The United Nations' Disarmament Plan For America?

United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs  document in question.

I would like to point out that according to the PolitiFact  article:” Farhan Hag, associate spokesperson for the Secretary-General,  said  “The document number (A/CN.11/L.72) doesn’t conform to our standard  system, in  any case”. 

But is this true? First we need to ask some very important questions.

  1. Is there a motive to lie?
  2. Are these statements posted on Politifact factual?
  3. Have these reporters been known for disinformation campaign’s before?
  4. What purpose could be obtained by covering up and spreading  disinformation?
  5. Does UNODA have a history of “disarming citizens” in other countries? Are  there ties to New York City?
  6. Finally, is this document real?

Yes, there is a motive to lie. By denying this UNODA “restricted” document,  it buys the corrupt officials within our government and the United Nations more  time for “damage control.” It is no secret that the United Nations has  intentions to “disarm” the American people, nor is it a surprise that our  government and Mainstream Media (paid off pundits) are covering up the fact our  government is still working with the United Nations to implement UN Agenda 21  within the United States. Our government knows if they do not use “damage  control” that the American people will stand together, we will not tolerate  this, and all their plans will be ruined.

The Obama administration has been forcing UN Agenda 21 through the EPA “rules and guidelines” for years. We have also seen that ICLEI-Local  Governments for Sustainability (formerly known as International Council for  Local Environmental Initiatives – the name has been changed to disguise what  they are really doing) is the group used to manipulate “sustainable  development”  within local  communities working their way around the nation. The  “Disarmament  Commission – Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group” simply confirms in  black  and white what have been reporting on and fighting against for years.  Patriots  within local communities have been fighting against the implementation  of UN  Agenda 21 for years. Congress voted against the implementation  of UN  Agenda 21 years ago, after seeing the “Wildlands Project Map”. The Obama  administration pushes illegal “rules” via Executive Order bypassing  congress, implementing UN Agenda 21, while establishing a globalist “genocidal”   plan.

Have these reporters been known for disinformation campaigns before? Yes,  actually they have been caught in many disinformation campaigns. I am surprised  that anyone still finds them credible. I have previously “debunked” propaganda  that Politifact and The Washington Post put out to discredit  Senator Rand Paul’s truthful statements about the danger of the UN  Small Arms Trade Treaty. See other examples: here   and here.  PolitiFact strongly supports  Obama, leftist ideas, and lies on many occasions to cover for a political  agenda. Does it surprise anyone that once again Politifact is pushing a “Media  Psyop” in order to  protect this administration’s ultimate agenda?

In the search for truth I will pick apart quotes to see if it actually lines  up with what is being said by the document. First, let us see if there are any  document numbers, or comparisons that can be made through other UNODA documents  that would confirm and show these numbers are consistent with numbers used by  the UNODA “Disarmament Commission.” United  Nations General Assembly Disarmament Commission Substantive Session in New  York, April 1-19 2013. This document is numbered (A/CN.10/L.70). If you scroll  down to the bottom of this document you can see the bar code numbers as well.  Which amazingly, surprise the bar-codes match the (A/CN.11/L.72) “Disarmament  Commission – Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group” bar code. Bar Code  number is “12-53542 (E) 091012″. Thus showing that these numbers are used, and  also coincide with UNODA and United Nations actual documents. Other examples of  comparable numbers can be found here.

Does UNODA have a history of “disarming citizens” in other countries? Are  there ties to New York City? The answer is yes on both counts. Take a lookhere. You will also find another  branch out of UNODA is called “UNLIREC” which has also been used to disarm  citizens around the world in the name of “safety”. The Official  Website will show you they not only confiscate small weapons but destroy  these small arms as well.

In conclusion there is enough evidence to suggest this document is the real  deal. It is my strong opinion this document should be investigated by the  congressional oversight committee. If this document is legitimate and we fail  to  act upon it, then we have allowed our country to be destroyed because we  choose  to believe known “propaganda” news agencies. If it is not legitimate  then at  least we did our duty of due diligence.

While I can not confirm 100% percent that this is an original document. If we  do not require an investigation into this document, and it is legitimate, we  have allowed ourselves to be complicit with the destruction of America as well  as humanity. It is our duty and responsibility to demand a serious  investigation  to get to the truth.

Click here to contact your  representatives and request they look into this document.

Editor’s Note:  As Lorri points out, there is much in the  document that can be compared to the UN’s history of weapons confiscation  across  the globe.  She does leave the possibility open that the document could  be  fraudulent.  With that in mind, I had a friend, who works with imaging  software  and the creation of videos.  It is his opinion that the document is  forged, due  to various anomalies in the document image.  In either case, judge  for  yourselves whether or not the UN has worked this way in the past and  whether or  not other news sources have been complicit in covering up the  truth.

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-... Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/is-this-document-the-smoking-gun-...

Views: 1082

Reply to This

 Please donate to TCC.  Your Contribution is greatly appreciated. Donate safely and securely through PayPal

Latest Activity

luis✩USA replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion The Steam Room
"Don't be surprised if...when?...crazy Joe calls it off before Summer starts. …"
15 hours ago
Patricia Gillenwater replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion The Steam Room
"Love your post Luis. For sure the dem's have a variety of manure to apply to landscapes.…"
15 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion The Steam Room
"Btw, Rush suggested a kissing booth as a fundraiser.  LOL How about a -scratch-n-sniff? q:-D"
16 hours ago
luis✩USA replied to Suzie Nielsen's discussion The Steam Room
"IT'S OFFICIAL Joe stand-up-chuck Biden will be heading to Pittsburg w/ his hands out. It is…"
16 hours ago
John Velisek posted a discussion

Obama and OFA Are a Shadow Government

In the eight years of the Obama administration, there were members of deep state cadres of…See More
16 hours ago
LANYON posted discussions
yesterday
Patricia Gillenwater commented on luis✩USA's blog post IS EUROPE BACK IN THE DARK AGES?
"Western culture she's falling to the wolves."
yesterday
luis✩USA replied to luis✩USA's discussion POLITICS...ARGH!
"ps: Btw, the likes of Mitt Romney pose w/ "outrage" against DT over that worthless…"
yesterday

Volcano's and Earthquakes


Your Contribution is Greatly Appreciated

Donate safely and securely through PayPal

© 2019   Created by Suzie Nielsen.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service